Climategate: how the ‘greatest scientific scandal of our generation’ got its name


In his superb summary of the Climategate story so far, Christopher Booker generously credits me with having invented the name. Almost but not quite. The person who really coined it was a commenter called “Bulldust” on the Watts Up With That site. He wrote:

Hmmm how long before this is dubbed ClimateGate?

‘Not at all long’ was the answer. I picked up his ball and ran with it. And yes,  I totally agree with all those of you who groan that it’s too obvious or insufficiently witty (Mark Steyn’s Warmergate is better). It may even be that the latest name from the US is more apposite.

Climaquiddick, they’re calling it now. Why? Because the liberal media aren’t reporting it with the glee and enthusiasm and foaming self-righteousness they accorded Watergate. Instead, they’re giving it the grudging, embarrassed non-coverage the libtard MSM invariably does to a story they’d rather, ahem, drown.

Related posts:

  1. Climategate: how the MSM reported the greatest scandal in modern science
  2. Watching the Climategate scandal explode makes me feel like a proud parent
  3. Climategate 2.0: the Warmists’ seven stages of grief
  4. Murdoch, Hackgate, Climategate, the Guardian and the vile hypocrisy of the Left

One Response to “Climategate: how the ‘greatest scientific scandal of our generation’ got its name”

  1. Carl C says:April 20, 2010 at 5:27 pmWhy don’t they call it Delingpolegate? How to bash scientist and misrepresent science? We’re still waiting to hear what this great scandal is? Is the world actually cooling? Are NASA and all the industrial world’s scientific insitutions all lying to us? Can Delingpolegate expose more than just his disinformation?
Liked it? Take a second to support James on Patreon!