No one cares about Julian Assange any more. Good.

Maybe it was Wikileaks, the evil blond rat in South Park, that did it – but suddenly no one seems to care about the fate of Julian Assange.

I remember when I first broached the subject in 2010 feeling rather as I do when writing now about Gaza: “I’m about to alienate at least 50 per cent of my readership.” That’s because back then, even intelligent, informed, libertarian types couldn’t quite make up their minds what to think about the weird Australian. Was he liberating us all from the tyranny of the surveillance state? Or was he just a grubby, manipulative egoist, traitor and alleged rapist?

Now though, no one seems to have been even slightly moved by Assange’s revelations over the weekend that two years stranded under effective house arrest in the Ecuadorian embassy in London has given him a heart condition and caused his skin to go even more vampire-pale. (Personally, I was more concerned about the fact that the Ecuadorians seem neither to have a sun roof nor a garden.)

Nor is there much interest in the fate that awaits him. I looked at the Tweets responding to his press conference announcement that he would be giving himself up to the police “soon.” They were all callously flippant.

Even his rich celebrity friends – among them Michael Moore, Ken Loach, and Jemima Khan – have gone strangely quiet. (But then, maybe Khan can only deal with one skanky, lefty freak show at a time, and she’s got her hands full right now with Russell Brand.)

Assange, it seems, is very much yesterday’s flavour-of-the-month. The chattering classes have grown bored with their plaything.
Read the rest at Breitbart London

Related posts:

  1. Julian Assange is not a Climategate hero
  2. Welcome to ManBearPighaven: the lovely new home that your carbon taxes bought
  3. Chicken Little jumps the shark
  4. Want to live on a film set? How Hollywood is bringing New Orleans, Paris and Berlin to a location near you

Post navigation

Julian Assange is not a Climategate hero

Warped perspective

Assange: Soap-dodging creep; probably a vampire

Assange: Soap-dodging creep; probably a vampire

My friend Jonathan Foreman has written two superb pieces on Julian Assange – one at Frumforum and one at Commentary – explaining in persuasive detail why the creepy, soap-dodging Australian isn’t quite the selfless hero his supporters claim he is.

Some of my libertarian friends have got it into their heads that Assange is all that stands between the internet as last bastion of freedom of speech and a vicious clampdown by the world’s tyrannical governments. If that’s what Assange actually stood for I’d be backing him all the way. But the impression I get is that he’s much more malevolent and puckishly irresponsible than that. I see nothing big or clever or noble about releasing information which results in, say, Afghans who have been helping US forces being executed or which makes it harder for Western diplomats to perform their roles with tact and discretion. The only reason you could think it was is if you believed that the West was morally inferior to countries like Iraq, China, Iran or Russia and therefore deserved to be betrayed from within in order to make the world more fair and balanced.

Foreman heard for himself Assange’s warped perspective at a conference he gave in Oslo earlier this year.

Assange then reminded “those of you in the audience familiar with World War II” of “the statement that the Nazis put on the front of concentration camps that ‘work brings freedom’—an idea that Himmler had when he himself was in prison.” After a dramatic pause he continued: “But in my investigations, exposing documents which include many abuses by the United States military, which include main manuals of prison camps like Abu Ghraib, Baghdad, and Guantanamo, I have seen pictures on the front of their camps of their slogans. So guess which camp has ‘honor bound to defend freedom’ on the front of it?”

Assange paused again: “The defense of freedom as a value is on the front of Guantanamo Bay! And I say that, as a perversion of the truth, that that slogan is worse than ‘work brings freedom.’?”

Only days after his triumphant revelation of “Collateral Murder,” and only seven months before Assange would release 250,000 secret American diplomatic cables and thereby force American foreign policy into uncharted waters, Assange calmly equated Guantanamo, a prison facility with 600 inmates, to Auschwitz—a Nazi death camp in which over a million people were murdered.

Assange, in other words, is not so much an outspoken defender of freedom and democracy as he is yet another West-hating Quisling in the fine traditions of Noam Chomsky, Michael Moore and George Soros. (It’s no coincidence that he has received financial help from the last two. Anyone with Moore and Soros – and leftie filmmaker Ken Loach – on his side is, almost by definition, a bad thing. As for the Jemima Goldsmith thing, no, I don’t understand that one either, except that – cf also PETA, Baader Meinhof – pretty rich girls do love a crap cause).

But there’s one mistake in Foreman’s second article I would like to correct. He says:

One of the most important WikiLeaks postings was the release of the Climategate e-mails that revealed how British academics at the heart of the global-warming consensus had conspired to withhold awkward statistics.

This just isn’t true. At least not in the sense that Assange or WikiLeaks deserve any credit whatsoever for breaking the story. It’s a lie – put about, naturally, by the fork-tongued Assange – which has been very effectively rebutted by Steve McIntyre. (H/T Charles The Moderator at WUWT)

Jeff Id links to a YouTube video of WikiLeaks’ Assange making a variety of untrue or inflated claims about Climategate and WikiLeaks’ role.

Assange falsely claimed that the Climategate emails were broken by WikiLeaks. This is obviously untrue as CA readers know. I can date WikiLeaks’ entry by contemporary comments. The first notice of the emails at WikiLeaks was 2009/11/21 at 2.50 AM Eastern (12:50 AM blog time). The emails had been downloaded by many people (including me) from a Russian server on Nov 19 and had been downloaded by WUWT moderators on Nov 17. A contemporary comment in a CA thread says that WikiLeaks was down and refers people to megauploads. WikiLeaks has not even been a major reference for Climategate – that belongs to eastangliaemails.com (originally anelegantchaos.org) which was up on Nov 20 and provided a searchable database.

This may seem like nitpicking, but it matters. First it denies proper credit to the real people responsible for breaking Climategate: Stephen Mosher, Lucia, Anthony Watts, Jeff Id, Steve McIntyre et al. Second, it gives the false impression that Assange is more heroic, decent and politically even-handed than he truly is.

Related posts:

  1. Alfred S: Australian schoolboy; climate hero
  2. Steven Mosher: the real hero of Climategate?
  3. Childhood hero
  4. Climategate: Mad Sunday

3 thoughts on “Julian Assange is not a Climategate hero”

  1. K Gallowglaich says:25th December 2010 at 7:28 amMr. Delingpole,

    A Merry Christmas to you and all your readers! We had hoped that your continuing reference to “Climategate” was on the wane, in view of the nature of what that Russian leak represented and who was behind it. The “evidence” of course amounted to little more than internecine squabbling between warring academics and did not represent any proof whatsoever that “Climate Change” was not occurring – surely now seen as a ludicrous proposition. Those of us who are working quite hard at developing solutions to what is now being observed do wish you might consider the possibility of being a little more responsible. However we do understand your need to continue to posture in a right-wing position in your line of work and at your time of life. Hopefully your September angst at your chosen profession has abated and all is well on the education front.

    Best Wishes,

    K. Gallowglaich

  2. Velocity says:29th December 2010 at 9:29 amAssange has been ‘Climateaudited’ or ‘Steve McIntyred’ if you like. I don’t know of many that can be so scrutinised and not be sceptic’d down to the absolute truth (McIntyre is a diamond – hard drill bit – of our era).

    Climateaudits article on Wikis Climategate claims was the first prick in the bubble for me too, followed a couple of weeks later by a ZeroHedge article that surmised Assanges leaks were about as damaging as tittle-tattle and served the purpose of Big Bro to further erode freedsoms, specifically on the net where Gov’t to date has lost control.

    When that insidious self-serving ponce, Andy Warhol, said everyone in the future would have their 15 minutes of fame he knew nothing of the internet. Heros and anti-heros are made today in 15 minutes and the webs multi-brained multi analysis strips it bare down to truth in 15 minutes too (if you’re able to distinguish between signal and noise, some skill that takes!).

    So here’s respect for the www

    It’ll bring down the corrupt self-serving scum of the Gov’t and corporate monopolists and also hopefully level the rising anti-heros too (aka Stalin, Hitler and Castro) who promise salvation but in truth will deliver more of the same.

    How are you coming along with your Republican saviour and the Tea Party James?

    Has the penny dropped you’re carrying an alien in your chest!!

  3. Mohammed Ismail says:8th January 2011 at 9:45 pmI agree Jamie, Julian is not a hero!

    Here is a great article (extensive) analysing what wikileaks “leaked” and who it benefitted:

    http://qwmagazine.co.uk/politics/wikileaks-the-definitive-analysis-of-the-latest-leak-and-who-stands-to-benefit

Comments are closed.

Post navigation